This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

BIOSLEVEL

January 6, 2009Home » Articles & Reviews » Hardware » Networking


Main Navigation

Login

Supporters


Add to Technorati Favorites

Upcoming Events

Top Sponsors

Sponsored Ads

HighPoint Technologies RocketRAID 3120


July 30, 2008
Sean "Obsidian" Potter
Colin "Rhettigan" Dean
HighPoint Technologies
Forums
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Performance, Continued

Copy Tests

When benchmark drives or other forms of storage, I typically transfer between drives. Unfortunately, I don't have drives that stand up to the theoretical speeds that the array has shown in both hdparm and dd tests. Thusly, I'm forced to create a RAMdisk to test transfer speeds. A RAMdisk is a chunk of RAM converted to a mountable disk. Any data on the RAMdisk disappears after a reboot. A brief HOW-TO for RAMdisks can be found at Vanemery.com.

Let's look at the results of the RAMdisk's hdparm and dd: (Higher is better)

# hdparm -t /dev/ram0
/dev/ram0: 
Timing buffered disk reads:   2534MB in  3.01 seconds = 842 MB/sec
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/ram/test bs=1024 count=1000000
1.1 GB copied, 8.5874s seconds, 131 MB/s

With that much bandwidth, I should have no issues copy files to and from the drive. Since my RAMdisks are configured for 1GB in size, I decided to use a 700MB movie file for copying. After placing the movie on the RAID array, I copied it to the RAMdisk. Higher is better.

Afterwards, I copied it back.

Seek Times

Another important aspect of hard drives is random seek times. This determines how fast the disks finds a piece of data on the disk. The folks at LinuxInsight have a fantastic little script capable of checking this. It may not be the most accurate, but the results very much speak for the themselves when looking at a single drive against a RAID array. Lower is better.

Enjoy the review? Subscribe to our RSS Feed.

« Previous1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »